Shape Computation Lab

The Atrium Hotel Grammar

🞩

01. The plans of the 1967 Hyatt Regency in Atlanta, GA, USA, from bottom to top: the lobby level (LLr); a typical guestroom level (LG); and the roof level (LR).

02. Shape rules 01-05 for Stage 1: Framework

03. Derivation of the framework for a square atrium hotel.

04. Shape rules 06-11 for Stage 2: Configuration.

05. Derivation of the configuration for a square atrium hotel.

06. Shape rules 12-20 for Stage 3: Style.

07. Derivation of the style for a square atrium hotel.

08. Five dihedral configurations; Five cyclic configurations; Five initial shapes for atrium hotels.

09. A sketch for the derivation of the typical guestroom level for five initial shapes in the atrium hotel language (Part I)

10. A sketch for the derivation of the typical guestroom level for five initial shapes in the atrium hotel language (Part II)

11. Alternative atria, from left to right: a a circular hotel; a triangular hotel; a pentagonal hotel; a hexagonal hotel.

Heather Ligler and Athanassios Economou

2018

 

Keywords: John Portman; Formal specification of architectural style; Shape grammars

John Portman’s atria are among his most celebrated and contested forms, captivating the popular imagination while also setting the tone for principles of architectural hospitality imitated worldwide. Still, both Portman’s contributions and subsequent replication inspired by his work remains difficult to assess, with no coherent theory to differentiate the subtlety and value of the originals, or even to distinguish between a copy and the real thing.

This project opens up the subject by addressing the hospitality corpus from its introduction in the emblematic and speculative 1967 Hyatt Regency in Atlanta, Georgia, Portman’s first atrium hotel. The commercial language of hollow forms initiated in the hotels is considered here as a unique iteration of the organizing principles Portman claims can be found in his 1964 personal domestic work, Entelechy I. This productive myth is one that can be engaged today in a vital way to research and remix Portman’s architectural language by looking and looking again at Entelechy I to constructively experiment with its resourcefulness as an innovation engine. This starting point is intriguing to map Portman’s claims, but more importantly to engage his work in another way and likewise inform additional applications. In all, the study here focuses on the atrium hotel language and its implicit relation to the house to begin structuring this effort. The outcomes include: a) a formal analysis of the atrium hotel; b) a parametric shape grammar for the atrium hotel; and c) a transformation grammar that explores the logic of atrium hotel composition in a variety of contexts, here simulated by a series of varied initial shapes.